Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia (ARVD) – ECG

Clinical calculation support · Verify results before clinical use

Appcardio ECG Library · Clinical Interpretation

ECG - Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia (ARVD)

Recognize the electrocardiographic manifestations of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), understand the mechanisms of delayed right-ventricular activation and repolarization, and interpret these findings in the context of a multimodal diagnostic assessment.

ECG diagnosisVentricular arrhythmiasCardiomyopathyAdvanced level

1. Introduction

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), historically termed arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD), is an inherited myocardial disease characterized by progressive loss of cardiomyocytes and fibrous or fibro-fatty replacement, classically involving the right ventricle. Left-ventricular involvement may coexist, and some families show a biventricular or left-dominant phenotype. The broader term arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) encompasses this phenotypic spectrum.

The disease creates an electrically and structurally heterogeneous myocardium that supports ventricular ectopy, re-entrant ventricular tachycardia, and potentially sudden cardiac death. Exercise may increase arrhythmic risk and can accelerate phenotypic expression in susceptible individuals. Presentation ranges from incidental ECG abnormalities to exertional palpitations, syncope, sustained VT, aborted cardiac arrest, or later ventricular dysfunction.

Clinical framing: ARVC is not diagnosed from a single ECG sign. Diagnosis integrates electrical abnormalities, ventricular morphology and function, tissue characterization, arrhythmia burden, family history, and genetic findings.

2. Electrophysiology and Pathophysiology

Desmosomal and other disease-associated variants can impair mechanical coupling between cardiomyocytes. Repeated mechanical stress, particularly during intense endurance or competitive exercise, contributes to myocyte injury and replacement fibrosis. Fibrous and fatty tissue interspersed with surviving myocardium produces regions of slow and non-uniform conduction.

Depolarization abnormality

Delayed activation of the right-ventricular free wall produces terminal conduction delay, prolonged terminal activation, and occasionally discrete low-amplitude post-QRS signals described as epsilon waves.

Repolarization abnormality

Abnormal ventricular activation and regional myocardial disease alter repolarization, producing T-wave inversion, particularly in the right precordial leads V1–V3.

Arrhythmia substrate

Patchy scar and surviving myocardial channels can support slow-conduction re-entry. Ventricular arrhythmias often have a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology because activation begins in the right ventricle.

Disease progression

Although the right ventricle is classically predominant, left-ventricular involvement and progressive biventricular systolic dysfunction can occur.

3. Characteristic ECG Features

3.1 T-wave inversion in right precordial leads

T-wave inversion in V1–V3, in the absence of complete right bundle branch block (RBBB), is a major repolarization criterion in the 2010 Revised Task Force Criteria in individuals older than 14 years. T-wave inversion limited to V1–V2 is less specific and may be a normal variant in some individuals. Interpretation must account for age, ethnicity, lead placement, and the presence of RBBB.

3.2 Epsilon wave

An epsilon wave is a low-amplitude signal between the end of the QRS complex and the onset of the T wave, typically in V1–V3. It has traditionally been regarded as a depolarization marker of delayed right-ventricular activation. However, epsilon waves are difficult to define reproducibly, are vulnerable to filtering and recording conditions, and show substantial interobserver variability. The 2023 ESC guideline advises caution because of frequent overdiagnosis and limited incremental diagnostic value.

Original ECG illustration showing an epsilon wave in lead V1, attributed to delayed right ventricular conduction
Epsilon wave in V1. The small terminal deflection after the main QRS complex is the feature described in the source illustration. Source: Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia (ARVD).pdf, page 2. Image reproduced from the supplied LITFL PDF; publication requires confirmation of reuse rights.

3.3 Terminal activation delay and S-wave upstroke

A prolonged terminal activation duration (TAD) is measured from the nadir of the S wave to the end of the QRS complex, including any R′, in V1, V2, or V3. A value of ≥55 ms in the absence of complete RBBB is a minor depolarization criterion in the 2010 Task Force framework. A delayed S-wave upstroke and localized right-precordial QRS prolongation may provide visual clues, but should not be substituted for the formal measurement.

Original ECG tracing demonstrating prolonged S-wave upstroke in V2 and localized QRS widening
Prolonged S-wave upstroke in V2. The source highlights delayed terminal activation and localized QRS widening. Source: Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia (ARVD).pdf, page 2. Image reproduced from the supplied LITFL PDF; publication requires confirmation of reuse rights.

3.4 Ventricular ectopy and ventricular tachycardia

Ventricular premature beats (VPBs) and VT with LBBB morphology suggest a right-ventricular origin. Under the 2010 criteria, more than 500 ventricular extrasystoles per 24 hours is a minor arrhythmia criterion. VT with LBBB morphology and a superior axis is a major criterion; an RV outflow tract (RVOT) pattern with inferior axis is a minor criterion. A single LBBB/inferior-axis VT morphology is not specific for ARVC and may occur in idiopathic RVOT VT.

Original 12-lead ECG showing regular broad-complex tachycardia with left bundle branch block morphology and inferior axis
RVOT-pattern ventricular tachycardia. The supplied source describes a regular broad-complex tachycardia with LBBB morphology, an inferior axis, and AV dissociation. Source: Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia (ARVD).pdf, page 5. Image reproduced from the supplied LITFL PDF; publication requires confirmation of reuse rights.

3.5 Additional ECG observations

  • Localized QRS prolongation or terminal conduction delay in V1–V3.
  • Low QRS voltage in limb leads may occur, particularly with more extensive or left-ventricular disease, but is not specific.
  • Ventricular ectopy may increase with exercise or adrenergic stimulation.
  • A normal resting ECG does not exclude early or concealed disease.
Original twelve-lead baseline ECG from a patient with ARVD, showing right-precordial epsilon wave, localized QRS widening, and T-wave inversion
Baseline 12-lead ECG example. The source describes T-wave inversion in precordial and inferior leads, an epsilon wave in V1, and localized QRS widening in V1–V2. Source: Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia (ARVD).pdf, page 4. Image reproduced from the supplied LITFL PDF; publication requires confirmation of reuse rights.

4. Systematic ECG Interpretation

  1. Confirm technical quality. Check calibration, paper speed, limb and precordial lead placement, artefact, and whether a complete RBBB is present. Standard calibration is usually 25 mm/s and 10 mm/mV.
  2. Assess rhythm and ectopy. Identify sinus rhythm, premature ventricular complexes, couplets, nonsustained VT, or sustained VT. Document the frequency and morphology of ventricular ectopy.
  3. Inspect right-precordial repolarization. Examine T waves in V1–V3. Determine whether inversion extends beyond V1 and whether complete RBBB or another explanation is present.
  4. Inspect terminal QRS activation. Look for a discrete epsilon-like signal and measure TAD from the S-wave nadir to the end of QRS in V1–V3. Avoid calling baseline noise or fragmented QRS an epsilon wave.
  5. Characterize any VT. LBBB morphology suggests a right-ventricular origin. Determine axis: superior-axis VT is more concerning for ARVC than a typical inferior-axis RVOT pattern.
  6. Integrate, do not overcall. Correlate ECG findings with symptoms, family history, ambulatory monitoring, echocardiography, CMR, and genetic assessment. The ECG alone is insufficient to establish ARVC.
Recording tip: The supplied LITFL source notes that some authors use rhythm strips at 50 mm/s and 20 mm/mV to make subtle terminal signals easier to inspect. This is an optional display technique, not a diagnostic criterion; preserve a standard 12-lead ECG for formal interpretation.

5. Diagnostic Criteria: What the ECG Can and Cannot Establish

The 2010 Revised Task Force Criteria use a combination of six diagnostic domains. Findings are classified as major or minor; diagnosis depends on the combination across categories rather than any single ECG feature.

ECG domainMajor criterion (2010)Minor criterion (2010)
RepolarizationT-wave inversion in V1–V3 or beyond in individuals >14 years, without complete RBBB.T-wave inversion in V1–V2 in individuals >14 years, without complete RBBB; or V1–V4 with complete RBBB.
Depolarization / conductionEpsilon wave in V1–V3.Late potentials on signal-averaged ECG meeting specified technical criteria; or TAD ≥55 ms in V1–V3 without complete RBBB.
Ventricular arrhythmiasNSVT or sustained VT with LBBB morphology and superior axis.NSVT or sustained VT with LBBB morphology and inferior axis (RVOT configuration), or >500 ventricular extrasystoles/24 h.

Diagnostic classification under the 2010 framework: definite ARVC requires two major criteria, or one major plus two minor criteria, or four minor criteria from different categories. Borderline and possible categories are also defined by lesser combinations. Criteria must be applied using the full published framework and appropriate age-specific considerations.

Important update: The 2020 Padua criteria broaden the framework to include left-ventricular and biventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy phenotypes. The 2023 ESC cardiomyopathy guideline recognizes the 2010 Task Force criteria as established for ARVC and notes that the Padua criteria extend phenotyping but were not yet externally validated at the time of publication.

Epsilon-wave caution: Although an epsilon wave is a major depolarization criterion in the 2010 framework, the 2023 ESC guideline emphasizes frequent overcalling and poor interobserver agreement. It should not be used as a stand-alone diagnostic label.

6. Fontaine Leads

Fontaine bipolar precordial leads (F-ECG) were developed to improve visualization of right-ventricular electrical activity and may increase the visibility of epsilon waves in selected cases. They are an adjunct to, not a replacement for, the standard 12-lead ECG.

  • Right arm (RA): over the manubrium.
  • Left arm (LA): over the xiphoid process.
  • Left leg (LL): in the standard V4 position (fifth intercostal space, midclavicular line).

The three bipolar chest leads are designated FI, FII, and FIII. The supplied source notes that the vertical FI lead may accentuate atrial potentials and can assist in examining epsilon waves or AV dissociation during VT.

Fontaine bipolar precordial ECG lead placement diagram showing RA at the manubrium, LA at the xiphoid, and LL at the V4 position
Fontaine bipolar precordial lead placement. Diagram reproduced from Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia (ARVD).pdf, page 3. This is a lead-placement schematic, not an ECG recording. Publication requires confirmation of reuse rights.

7. Differential Diagnosis

ConditionPotentially similar ECG findingClues favouring the alternative
Idiopathic RVOT VTMonomorphic VT with LBBB morphology and inferior axis.Usually normal baseline ECG and cardiac imaging, no convincing family history, and no structural phenotype. A single RVOT-pattern VT does not establish ARVC.
Incomplete or complete RBBBTerminal right-precordial conduction delay and secondary T-wave inversion.Expected RBBB morphology and QRS duration; T-wave changes must be interpreted in the context of the conduction pattern.
Athlete's heartRight-ventricular enlargement and sometimes right-precordial repolarization variants.Physiological adaptation generally lacks regional RV akinesia, dyskinesia, aneurysm, or scar. Interpret in relation to training history and imaging.
MyocarditisVentricular arrhythmias, dynamic ST–T changes, and myocardial injury.Acute inflammatory presentation, troponin release, oedema or non-ischaemic injury on CMR; myocarditis can also mimic an arrhythmogenic phenotype.
Cardiac sarcoidosisVentricular arrhythmias and ventricular dysfunction.Conduction disease, extracardiac sarcoidosis, and characteristic inflammatory/scar imaging or PET findings may support the diagnosis.
Congenital or pressure/volume-loaded RVRV enlargement and secondary repolarization changes.Look for pulmonary hypertension, atrial septal defect, Ebstein anomaly, or other congenital shunts on clinical assessment and imaging.

8. Clinical Significance and Red Flags

Urgent assessment: Syncope during exercise, sustained VT, resuscitated cardiac arrest, haemodynamic compromise, or a strong family history of premature sudden cardiac death warrants urgent specialist assessment. Treat unstable sustained VT according to resuscitation protocols while investigating the underlying substrate.
  • Palpitations, exertional presyncope or syncope, and documented ventricular arrhythmias may be the first manifestations.
  • Sudden cardiac death can occur before overt ventricular dysfunction is recognized.
  • Progressive RV dysfunction and later biventricular heart failure may develop.
  • Risk assessment is individualized and incorporates prior cardiac arrest or sustained VT, arrhythmic syncope, ventricular function, arrhythmia burden, genotype, and other clinical markers.

9. Clinical Evaluation and Management Principles

Diagnostic evaluation

  • History and family assessment: characterize exertional symptoms, syncope, prior arrhythmia, exercise exposure, and a three-generation family history where possible.
  • 12-lead ECG and ambulatory monitoring: document repolarization/depolarization abnormalities and quantify ventricular ectopy or NSVT.
  • Cardiac imaging: echocardiography assesses RV size and function; cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is central to detailed RV assessment and can identify LV involvement and myocardial tissue abnormalities.
  • Genetic counselling/testing: consider testing for disease-associated variants and cascade clinical screening of first-degree relatives in an appropriately counselled family.
  • Exclude phenocopies: consider myocarditis, sarcoidosis, RV infarction, pulmonary hypertension, congenital shunts, and idiopathic RVOT VT.

Management principles

  • Exercise: patients with a clinical diagnosis should avoid competitive and high-intensity endurance exercise; individualized advice should be provided by an experienced team. Exercise restriction is also relevant to genotype-positive individuals.
  • Arrhythmia management: beta-blockers are commonly used to reduce adrenergic drive and arrhythmia burden. Other antiarrhythmic therapy is selected according to symptoms, arrhythmia type, ventricular function, and specialist assessment.
  • Catheter ablation: may reduce recurrent VT or ICD therapies, but does not eliminate the progressive myocardial substrate or replace an ICD when one is indicated.
  • ICD: consider for secondary prevention after cardiac arrest or sustained haemodynamically significant VT, and for selected patients at high predicted risk after shared decision-making. An epsilon wave or isolated T-wave inversion is not, by itself, an ICD indication.
  • Heart failure: treat ventricular dysfunction using contemporary guideline-directed heart-failure therapy and specialist follow-up.
  • Family screening: provide genetic counselling and clinical evaluation for at-risk relatives. Follow-up intervals depend on age, genotype, and phenotype.
Correction to older teaching: The supplied 2020 LITFL article mentions routine warfarin to prevent thrombus formation in RV hypokinesis and implies urgent ICD insertion for any listed high-risk feature. These should not be applied as blanket rules. Anticoagulation requires a separate indication (for example, documented thrombus or another established indication), and ICD decisions require individualized contemporary risk assessment and shared decision-making.

10. Common Interpretation Pitfalls

  • Diagnosing ARVC solely because T waves are inverted in V1 or V1–V2, without considering age, normal variants, RBBB, and clinical context.
  • Calling baseline noise, QRS fragmentation, or a terminal R′ an epsilon wave without a reproducible signal clearly separated from the QRS.
  • Measuring terminal activation duration from the wrong reference point; it is measured from the nadir of the S wave to the end of QRS.
  • Equating any LBBB-morphology VT with ARVC. Idiopathic RVOT VT often has an inferior axis and may occur in a structurally normal heart.
  • Assuming a normal resting ECG excludes early disease.
  • Using the old term “fatty infiltration” as if fat alone were diagnostic. Diagnosis depends on the integrated phenotype, not a nonspecific visual impression of fat.
  • Using historical treatment statements from the source PDF as current universal recommendations.

11. ECG Pearls and Quick Reference

Think ARVC when

Young person with exertional syncope or ventricular arrhythmia, right-precordial T-wave inversion, and VT/VPBs of RV origin.

Most useful ECG clues

T-wave inversion V1–V3 without complete RBBB; terminal activation delay; ventricular ectopy/VT with LBBB morphology.

More concerning VT morphology

LBBB morphology with superior axis is a major 2010 arrhythmia criterion; inferior-axis RVOT-pattern VT is less specific.

Do not over-rely on

Epsilon waves: technically difficult, variably interpreted, and cautioned against in contemporary ESC guidance.

FindingPractical interpretation
T-wave inversion V1–V3Major 2010 criterion if >14 years and no complete RBBB.
Epsilon wave V1–V3Major 2010 criterion, but contemporary interpretation requires caution.
Terminal activation duration ≥55 msMinor 2010 criterion in V1–V3 without complete RBBB.
>500 ventricular extrasystoles/24 hMinor 2010 arrhythmia criterion.
LBBB VT with superior axisMajor 2010 arrhythmia criterion.
LBBB VT with inferior axisMinor 2010 arrhythmia criterion; consider idiopathic RVOT VT.
Self-check

A young adult presents with exertional syncope and monomorphic VT with LBBB morphology and an inferior axis. Does this ECG pattern alone establish ARVC?

No. An LBBB/inferior-axis pattern is compatible with an RVOT origin and is a minor arrhythmia criterion in the 2010 framework, but idiopathic RVOT VT is an important differential. Diagnosis requires integration with baseline ECG, cardiac imaging, family/genetic findings, and other criteria. Exertional syncope remains a red flag requiring prompt evaluation.

12. References

Arbelo E, Protonotarios A, Gimeno JR, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. European Heart Journal. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194.
Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modification of the Task Force Criteria. Circulation. 2010;121(13):1533–1541. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.840827.
Corrado D, Perazzolo Marra M, Zorzi A, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: the Padua criteria. International Journal of Cardiology. 2020;319:106–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.06.005.
Towbin JA, McKenna WJ, Abrams DJ, et al. 2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(11):e301–e372. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.007.
Buttner R, Burns E. Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia (ARVD). Life in the Fast Lane (LITFL) ECG Library. August 1, 2020. Supplied PDF source, 12 pages. The original resource identifies a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 licence; obtain permission before commercial reuse of its images or other protected material.
Educational disclaimer: This content is intended for educational purposes and should not replace clinical judgment, professional medical assessment, or institutional guidelines. Diagnostic criteria and management decisions should be applied by clinicians familiar with contemporary arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy guidance and the individual patient's clinical context.