HomeICU / Critical Cardiovascular Care Scores › Parkland Formula (Baxter Formula) for Burns

Parkland Formula (Baxter Formula) for Burns

  • Click on Body Parts

    Rule of Nines 4.5% 9% 9% 1% 9% 9% 4.5% 4.5% 18% 18% 18% 14% 14% 9% 9% 4.5% 9% 9% 9% 9% 4.5% 4.5%

    Total: 0%

  • Parkland Formula Explanation and Clinical Context
    Parkland formula, also known as Baxter formula, is a widely accepted method for estimating initial fluid resuscitation requirements in patients with significant burn injuries. The formula uses two primary variables which are the patient weight in kilograms and the percentage of total body surface area affected by partial thickness or full thickness burns. The total calculated volume represents the amount of crystalloid fluid that should be administered over the first twenty four hours after burn injury. Half of this volume is given during the first eight hours following the time of injury because the earliest period represents the phase with the most severe capillary leakage and highest risk of hypovolemic shock. The remaining half is infused during the next sixteen hours as vascular permeability begins to improve. Lactated Ringer solution is the recommended fluid because its electrolyte composition approximates extracellular fluid and helps reduce the risk of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis that can occur with large volume normal saline administration.

    Clinical interpretation requires continuous reassessment because the Parkland formula provides only an initial estimate. Urine output is the most reliable bedside indicator of adequate resuscitation in adults, with a target of 0.5 to 1 ml per kilogram per hour. Excessive fluid administration should be avoided because it can contribute to complications such as abdominal compartment syndrome, extremity compartment syndrome, and pulmonary edema. Inhalation injury, electrical burns, delayed presentation, and comorbidities such as cardiac disease or renal impairment may significantly increase or decrease fluid requirements. Therefore clinicians must titrate fluids based on physiologic response rather than relying solely on the formula. Early identification of under resuscitation is essential because prolonged hypoperfusion contributes to organ dysfunction and worsens outcomes. At the same time, preventing over resuscitation is equally important because fluid creep is associated with significant morbidity. The Parkland formula supports initial decision making but individual clinical judgment, hemodynamic parameters, and close monitoring remain central to guiding optimal fluid therapy.

    Reference:
    American Burn Association. Burn Shock Resuscitation Guidelines. Journal of Burn Care and Research 2018.
    Greenhalgh DG. Burn resuscitation. Journal of Burn Care and Research 2017.
    Pham TN et al. American Burn Association practice guidelines for burn shock resuscitation. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation 2008.
    StatPearls. Burn Fluid Resuscitation. 2024 update.

Discussion


No discussions yet. Be the first to comment.

Create Note

Notes are stored privately on your device only. No login required. Nothing is uploaded or shared.

My Notes

Report this Tool