HomeRadiology & Imaging–Omics Scores › CMR Feature Tracking Dyssynchrony Index (CMR-FT DI) Calculator

CMR Feature Tracking Dyssynchrony Index (CMR-FT DI) Calculator

  • Inputs for Systolic Dyssynchrony Index (SDI; time-to-peak based)
  • RR interval (ms)
  • Time-to-peak circumferential strain (ms) – AHA 16 segments
    Enter time-to-peak (TTP) for each segment from your CMR-FT report (basal, mid, apical; 16-segment model).
    S1
    S2
    S3
    S4
    S5
    S6
    S7
    S8
    S9
    S10
    S11
    S12
    S13
    S14
    S15
    S16
  • Optional: Onishi 2013 radial delay (mid-ventricle)
    Provide mid-ventricular anteroseptal and posterior segment TTP (ms) to reproduce the original FT-CMR dyssynchrony method.
    Anteroseptal TTP (ms)
    Posterior TTP (ms)
  • CMR Feature Tracking Dyssynchrony Index: Explanation and Clinical Context
    Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) enables derivation of strain-time curves from standard SSFP cine images without additional tagging sequences. Mechanical dyssynchrony can be quantified in two complementary ways. First, a systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI) is calculated as the standard deviation of segmental time-to-peak (TTP) strain across the left ventricular model (commonly 16 segments). Reporting SDI in milliseconds and normalized to the RR interval (% of cardiac cycle) captures absolute and relative temporal dispersion of contraction; lower SDI indicates more synchronous activation.

    A second, publication-derived approach focuses on the anteroseptal–posterior wall radial delay at the mid-ventricular level. This FT-CMR measure mirrors a validated speckle-tracking echocardiography paradigm and has shown good correlation with echo in diverse QRS durations; a delay ≥130 ms has been used as a dyssynchrony threshold in CRT studies.

    Beyond TTP dispersion, frequency-domain metrics like the circumferential uniformity ratio estimate (CURE) summarize synchrony on a 0–1 scale (1 = perfectly synchronous) and demonstrate good inter-study reproducibility; however, CURE requires access to the full strain waveform and specialized processing, so it is not implemented in this simplified calculator.

    Clinical significance.
    CMR-FT dyssynchrony assessment can supplement QRS width and scar characterization in CRT work-ups and in research on myocardial discoordination. While FT-CMR agrees with echocardiographic measures for more marked dyssynchrony and offers high image quality, variability for subtle dyssynchrony and intervendor differences mean values should be interpreted within clinical context and, when feasible, together with scar burden and electrical patterns.

    References:

    Onishi T, et al. Feature tracking measurement of dyssynchrony from CMR cine acquisitions: comparison with echocardiographic speckle tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:95. Key finding: FT-CMR radial anteroseptal–posterior delay correlated with echo; ≥130 ms used as dyssynchrony threshold.
    Kowallick JT, et al. Quantitative assessment of LV mechanical dyssynchrony based on standard cine images: inter-study reproducibility of CMR-FT dyssynchrony indices (including SDI and CURE). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson / JCMR abstracts & SAGE. 2016–2017.
    Bilchick KC, et al. Circumferential uniformity ratio estimate (CURE) from MR tagging predicts CRT response (0–1 scale; higher = more synchronous). JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008.
    Rahman ZU, et al. Feature tracking CMR overview: strain definitions and methodology. World J Cardiol. 2017.
    Helm RH, et al.; Rajiah P, et al. Uniformity ratio estimates and general MRI dyssynchrony concepts (CURE/RURE) and definitions of SD of TTP as dyssynchrony. Circulation 2005; RadioGraphics 2021.

Discussion


No discussions yet. Be the first to comment.

Create Note

Notes are stored privately on your device only. No login required. Nothing is uploaded or shared.

My Notes

Report this Tool