HomeAdvanced Structural Intervention Scores › PFO Closure Risk (RoPE) Score Calculator

PFO Closure Risk (RoPE) Score Calculator

  • Age (years)
  • History of hypertension
  • History of diabetes
  • Prior stroke or TIA
  • Current smoker
  • Cortical infarct on imaging
  • PFO Closure Risk (RoPE) Score: Explanation and Clinical Context
    The RoPE (Risk of Paradoxical Embolism) score is a validated 10-point tool designed for patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke in whom a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is detected. It estimates how likely the index stroke is causally related to the PFO (rather than incidental) and contextualizes the expected 2-year recurrence risk under medical management. The score assigns points for younger age and the absence of vascular risk factors (no hypertension, no diabetes, nonsmoking), no prior stroke/TIA, and the presence of a cortical infarct on neuroimaging. Higher scores (especially ≥7) indicate a higher probability that the stroke is PFO-related, whereas lower scores suggest the PFO is more likely incidental.

    Importantly, as the score increases the PFO-attributable fraction rises (approaching ~88% for scores 9–10), while the observed 2-year recurrence tends to be lower compared with low-score strata. These relationships reflect that patients whose index event is most plausibly PFO-mediated often have fewer competing stroke mechanisms and a relatively benign recurrence profile on medical therapy, whereas patients with low scores likely harbor non-PFO causes with higher recurrence. The RoPE score does not incorporate anatomic PFO risk features (e.g., large right-to-left shunt or atrial septal aneurysm) or concurrent venous thromboembolism. For closure decision-making, many groups therefore pair RoPE with an anatomic/clinical framework (e.g., PASCAL) and randomized-trial evidence, integrating patient age, stroke mechanism work-up, PFO features, and bleeding/device considerations.

    References:
    Kent DM, Ruthazer R, Weimar C, et al. An index to identify stroke-related vs incidental patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke. Neurology. 2013;81(7):619–625. PMC3775694.
    Thaler DE, Ruthazer R, Weimar C, et al. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) Study. J Am Heart Assoc / Neurology-related consortium resources; overview and pooled database methods. 2012–2014. (See PMCID: PMC4060865; and related analyses).
    Thaler DE, Kent DM. Patient Selection for PFO Closure Based on the RoPE Study. Cardiac Interventions Today. 2014; March/April:60–65. (Explains Bayes approach and strata ranges 0%–88%).
    Kent DM, Mir H, et al. Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE)–Estimated Attributable Fraction and Treatment Benefit. Stroke. 2020;51: in press at time; demonstrates correlation of RoPE-estimated attributable fraction with closure benefit.
    NCBI Bookshelf. RoPE Score and PASCAL classifications – table synopsis of variables and interpretive ranges.
    Kim JS, et al. Patent Foramen Ovale and Stroke. Korean Circ J. 2022; Table: PFO-attributable fraction and 2-year recurrence by RoPE strata (values used in this tool).

Discussion


No discussions yet. Be the first to comment.

Create Note

Notes are stored privately on your device only. No login required. Nothing is uploaded or shared.

My Notes

Report this Tool