HomePulmonary Vascular Disease & Right Ventricular Physiology › TAPSE/PASP Optimization Index (Therapeutic Decision Aid)

TAPSE/PASP Optimization Index (Therapeutic Decision Aid)

  • TAPSE Unit: mm (measured by M-mode at the lateral tricuspid annulus)
  • PASP Unit: mmHg (from TR Vmax + estimated RA pressure)
  • Choose Published Threshold Set (optional) Select a literature-derived model to tailor interpretation.
  • Custom Cutoffs (use only if "Custom Cutoffs" is selected)
    If provided, results will be: <= High-risk → "High", between High and Low → "Intermediate", >= Low → "Low".
  • TAPSE/PASP Optimization Index: Comprehensive Explanation and Clinical Context
    Definition & Formula: The TAPSE/PASP ratio (mm/mmHg) is a noninvasive surrogate of right ventricular-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling. It is calculated as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, in mm) divided by pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP, in mmHg).

    Measurement:
    TAPSE is measured by M-mode at the lateral tricuspid annulus in the apical 4-chamber view. PASP is estimated from peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (Bernoulli) plus an estimate of right atrial pressure (e.g., from IVC size/collapsibility).

    Interpretation:
    Lower ratios indicate RV-PA uncoupling. In heart failure populations, values ≤ 0.36 mm/mmHg consistently associate with worse outcomes; several cohorts identify ≤ 0.31 as a very abnormal tier. In pulmonary arterial hypertension, very low ratios (< 0.19) identify high 1-year mortality risk, while 0.19-0.31 reflects intermediate risk. In acute pulmonary embolism, a cut-off near 0.34 has been reported for adverse outcomes. These thresholds are population-specific and should be interpreted alongside clinical context and measurement quality.

    Clinical Significance:
    The ratio integrates RV contractile shortening (TAPSE) relative to afterload (PASP), offering a practical bedside gauge of RV reserve and treatment response. It adds prognostic value across HF (HFrEF/HFpEF), PAH, valve disease, CRT candidates, and acute PE cohorts.

    Limitations:
    Angle dependency and tethering can affect TAPSE; PASP estimation depends on adequate TR signal and RA pressure assumptions. Consider complementary parameters (RV FAC, S′, TAPSE/sPAP via invasive data, RV strain, TR grade, IVC indices) and disease-specific risk models.

    References
    Anastasiou V, et al. Heart Failure Reviews. 2024: TAPSE/PASP ≤ 0.36 linked to mortality in HF meta-analysis.
    Fortuni F, et al. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2023: In PAH, TAPSE/PASP < 0.19 associated with high 1-year mortality; 0.19-0.31 intermediate.
    Tello K, et al. Eur Respir J. 2019: Conceptual and empirical basis for RV-PA coupling via TAPSE/PASP.
    Riccardi M, et al. 2024 (open-access cohort): Prognostic value in outpatients with LV systolic dysfunction.
    Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, 2024: Acute PE optimal cut-off ≈ 0.34 by Youden index.
    Additional contemporary reviews: Yao M, et al. Diagnostics. 2025 (limitations); Gutierrez-Ortiz E, et al. J Clin Med. 2025 (TTE vs invasive agreement).

Discussion


No discussions yet. Be the first to comment.

Create Note

Notes are stored privately on your device only. No login required. Nothing is uploaded or shared.

My Notes

Report this Tool